Session: 2021-2022

ACLU-PA Position: Opposes

SB 982 would prohibit the use of private donations or contributions for operating elections, employing staff, selecting and equipping a polling place, or for use in voter education or outreach. 

SB 982 was filed in response to the CTCL grants (Center for Tech and Civic Life) that assisted counties with COVID-19-related preparation for the 2020 elections. There were NO restrictions on those grants; all counties were free to apply for those funds. Had that money not been available, some counties would not have been able to run elections in 2020. Most counties need temporary staff and most don’t have the resources to hire. Because the legislature has repeatedly failed to properly fund elections, and counties were desperate to have the resources needed to run fair elections safely during a pandemic, these grants patched a critical funding gap. If the legislature is committed to banning third-party grants from elections, then the General Assembly should include a provision to provide increased funding for county election offices.

Regarding the CTCL grants in particular:

  1. The CTCL grants were opt-in, and every legitimate jurisdiction that requested money received a grant. More than half of the grants were made to small jurisdictions, serving fewer than 25,000 voters. The only jurisdictions that did not receive grant funding were jurisdictions that did not ask for it.
  2. There were no partisan questions in the grant applications. Grant funding decisions were not made on a partisan basis. As demonstrated by the jurisdictions across the political spectrum that received money, partisan considerations played no role in the availability or awarding of funding. 
  3. Unfortunately, partisan politics arguably did play a role in which jurisdictions chose to apply for the funding. 
  4. Nationally, more than a dozen frivolous lawsuits were filed to discredit the CTCL COVID-19 Response Grants program. Every judge—conservative, liberal, and two Republican-appointed Supreme Court Justices—rejected these challenges, with one judge issuing a strongly-worded opinion in one case that labeled these challenges a “conspiracy theory.”
  5. In Pennsylvania, Republican federal Judge Matthew Brann ruled that CTCL grant recipients “have used CTCL funding in a nonpartisan way to facilitate the upcoming election; they have spent the CTCL money to set up satellite election offices, offer dropboxes, and pay for various election-related expenses. Defendants have notably not attempted to use the CTCL funds to increase voter turnout by, for example, implementing get-out-the-vote efforts. … Further, nothing in the record suggests that, if … use of the CTCL funding does increase voter turnout, it will necessarily benefit progressive candidates. The implication that increased voter turnout is inherently beneficial to progressive candidates is dubious at best.”

All 67 counties in Pennsylvania—red or blue, urban or rural—deserve the necessary funding to run secure and accessible elections. The General Assembly should protect the freedom to vote for all Pennsylvanians by fully funding our county elections offices so they don’t need to turn to nonprofits for assistance. But until the legislature is willing to do so, they should not tie the hands of local elections officials who are just trying to do their jobs.


Senator Lisa Baker


Passed Senate


2021 - 2022

Bill number